Tactical Management
Submit a special situation Written initial assessment within 72 hours. Confidential.
Contactcontact@tacticalmanagement.ch
DE · EN · ES Munich · Vienna · Zug
Case Study · Turnaround · Southern Europe

€6.99M Liabilities Eliminated in 16 Weeks: Turnaround of a Spanish Electrical Distributor.

Century-old electrical distributor with €1.9M projected net loss — sold as going concern after 16 weeks of restructuring. Six workstreams in one quarter, no insolvency proceedings.

Year of Exit 2014 · Going-Concern Sale · 16 Weeks

Tactical Management AG acquired in 2014 a century-old distributor of electrical components in Southern Europe with a projected net loss of €1.9 million, 152 employees and 14 oversized locations. Across six parallel workstreams — assets, workforce, suppliers, liquidity, operations and sales — we eliminated €6.99M in liabilities in 16 weeks, swung the operating result to +€1.21M and sold the business as a going concern, without opening insolvency proceedings.

This case study documents a full operational and financial restructuring of a Southern European mid-market distributor of electrical components. It exemplifies how Tactical Management stabilises substance under liquidity pressure: parallel workstreams within a single quarter, with a clear separation of viable substance from no-longer-tenable structure.

The Situation: Viable substance with a no-longer-tenable cost base

The portfolio company had operated for nearly one hundred years as one of its region's leading distributors of electrical components, lighting solutions, HVAC systems and building automation — with framework agreements across several global tier-one manufacturers.

Five consecutive years of contraction in construction and real estate had reduced revenues by two thirds. The company carried high liabilities, 14 oversized locations, near-zero liquidity and was tracking to a projected net loss of €1.9 million. Without intervention, insolvency proceedings were unavoidable within weeks.

The situation matched exactly the distress profile Tactical Management addresses: substance with sustainable market relevance, operational adjustment requirement, a window not yet closed by liquidity erosion — and ownership and governance structures no longer capable of carrying the necessary change themselves.

Six workstreams in one quarter

Parallel work across assets, workforce, suppliers, working capital, debt and sales strategy — a complete restructuring within a single quarter.

Assets: 40 percent inventory reduction in one quarter. Sale of owned vehicles, return of rented fleet, divestment of non-strategic real estate, closure of five branches.

Workforce: Headcount reduced from 152 to 80 employees. 37 employees placed directly into new positions at third-party companies by our team — active outplacement responsibility, not passive separation.

Suppliers: 135 individual refinancing agreements signed. Supplier base rationalised; key partners elevated to preferred-distributor status.

Liquidity: Inventory liquidation campaign. €2.88M in personal partner guarantees released. Deferred payments negotiated with public administrations.

Operations: Daily treasury reporting implemented. The business was repositioned from a volume distributor to a specialised industrial and thermal-technology operator.

Sales: Objective-based sales policy, CRM rollout, tightened collection timelines, margin-focused discount restructuring.

Signature transaction: €4.5M tier-one liability eliminated without insolvency proceedings

The most complex element was a €4.5 million exposure to a global tier-one manufacturer. We designed a four-step structured transaction that extinguished the debt entirely through a sector transfer — and avoided forced liquidation for all parties.

Step 1: The manufacturer transitions to direct invoicing of key accounts. Our company's role is restructured to commission-based agent — preserving the relationship while reducing balance-sheet exposure.

Step 2: The manufacturer sells its receivable against our company at an agreed price to a sector competitor — the liability leaves the manufacturer's books.

Step 3: Our company cedes its agency contract to that sector competitor — providing the commercial value underpinning the transaction.

Step 4: The €4.5M liability is extinguished. No insolvency proceedings. Clean exit for all three parties.

Transaction Details

Year of Exit

2014

Geography

Southern Europe (Spain)

Sector

Distribution of electrical components

Mandate Type

Full restructuring

Timeline

16 weeks

Outcome

Going-concern sale

Key Figures

€6.99M

Liabilities eliminated

−92%

Improvement vs projected net loss

16 weeks

Mandate to close

Process

From scoping to closing

01

Initial sounding & data-room access

Confidential first contact, NDA, description of the situation. First written assessment within 72 hours.

02

Indicative offer & workstream architecture

Valuation range and structuring proposal with defined parallel workstreams — assets, workforce, suppliers, liquidity, operations, sales.

03

Supplier refinancing

Negotiation of individual refinancing agreements with key and volume suppliers — 135 signed agreements.

04

Asset & location optimisation

Inventory reduction, branch closure, divestment of non-strategic real estate, return of rented fleet.

05

Workforce restructuring with outplacement

Reduction from 152 to 80 employees with active placement of 37 employees into third-party companies.

06

Tier-one sector transfer

Four-step transaction to eliminate the €4.5M tier-one liability without insolvency proceedings.

07

Repositioning & going-concern sale

Repositioning from volume to specialty distributor (industrial/thermal). Going-concern sale to a strategic acquirer.

Results

Every workstream delivered

MetricBefore MandateOutcome
Net Result −€1,900,000 (projected) −€152,814
Operating Result Deeply negative +€1,214,844
Liabilities reduced €6,987,186
Headcount 152 80
Supplier agreements None 135 signed
Major manufacturer exposure €4,500,000 Extinguished
Exit Insolvency risk Going-concern sale

Frequently asked questions

FAQ

Why was the company sold without insolvency proceedings?

The substance — customer base, tier-one framework agreements, established operational structures — remained viable. What was no longer viable were the ownership/governance structures and the cost base. An insolvency would have liquidated substance and structure together. Our approach separates them: structure is adjusted operationally; substance is preserved and transferred via a going-concern sale.

How was a €4.5M liability to a tier-one manufacturer eliminated?

Through a four-step sector transfer: the manufacturer sold its receivable at an agreed price to a non-sector competitor. Our company in return ceded its agency contract to that competitor. The commercial value of the agency contract formed the consideration. All three parties benefitted — the manufacturer lost no substance, the competitor gained a new market, our company lost the liability.

Which six workstreams run in parallel during a Tactical restructuring?

Assets (inventory reduction, branch closures, real-estate sales), Workforce (headcount adjustment with active outplacement), Suppliers (refinancing agreements, rationalisation), Liquidity (inventory liquidation, guarantee release, deferred payments), Operations (treasury reporting, repositioning), Sales (CRM, collection timelines, margin policy). All in parallel within a single quarter.

What substance size does a distress case need for Tactical to take a restructuring mandate?

Typically revenue €20–500 million and 100–2,000 employees. The decisive criterion is not current earnings but whether operational substance and market position remain viable. EBITDA can be negative to moderately positive. Critical is a window not yet closed by liquidity erosion.

How fast is this kind of complete restructuring actually feasible?

In this specific case: 16 weeks from mandate to full close. Prerequisites: seller willingness to hand over, a workable acquisition architecture and sufficient operating bandwidth to run six workstreams in parallel. Six weeks for the sounding and structuring phase, ten weeks for operational implementation.

Why is the identity of the company not disclosed?

Publishing distress case studies with names typically requires written consent of former or current owners. Out of confidentiality and the legal sensitivity of insolvency-adjacent reporting, we anonymise structurally — sector, region, size band and key figures remain original; the identity is protected.

Facts anonymised. Figures from the original transaction. Published with consent of the parties involved.

One action

Facing a similar situation?

Written first assessment in 72 hours. Confidential, indicative offer within a few working days.

Submit confidentially →